Radiometric dating answers
Experimental Errors The methods that give ancient ages produce almost as many "wrong" answers as "right" ones.The "correct" answer is chosen on the basis of stratigraphic sequences, that is, what kinds of fossils are buried nearby.Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.One is the Carbon-14 system used for dating fragments of once-living organisms.Leakey declared that the skull was 2.9 MY, and said that it "fits no previous models of human beginnings." It was named KNM-ER-1470 (for Kenya National Museum, East Rudolf, #1470).
Between 19 several teams made a number of radiometric measurements, and the results clustered around three ages-1.8 MY, 2.4 MY, and 2.6 MY.True would be more than happy to help introduce you to a pastor so you can experience the great blessing of being in a church family.Please use our Church Finder to easily locate and email a pastor near you.For K-Ar dates, it's easy to blame argon loss if the reported age is too short, or argon absorption if it's too long.
It is well known that argon, which is a gas, diffuses easily through rock, and there is no way of knowing whether that may have happened in any given case.
And yet, there is really no scientific reason proving that radiometric dating is correct, and a number of evidences showing that it doesn't work. We'll find that faith in materialism, and rejection of any supernatural activity, is the foundation stone of radiometric analysis, even before any measurements are made.